Report Details

Report Metadata
Report ID:
ae6fe4a325ea401f8c601c1738679b17
Domain:
einsle.cloud
Reporter:
Enterprise Outlook (dmarcreport@microsoft.com)
Status:
processed
Created:
2026-04-02 12:01:16
Processed:
2026-04-02 12:01:48
Claude AI Analysis
LOW
Summary: Excellent DMARC implementation for einsle.cloud. All 4 emails from 3 authorized IP addresses passed both SPF and DKIM authentication with proper alignment. The domain has a strict 'reject' policy in place, and no emails were quarantined or rejected, indicating healthy email authentication across all sending sources.
What's Working Well
  • 100% SPF pass rate across all 4 emails - SPF records are correctly configured and all sending sources are properly authorized
  • 100% DKIM pass rate across all 4 emails - DKIM signing is working correctly with proper key configuration
  • Strict 'reject' policy is in place, providing maximum protection against domain spoofing and phishing attacks
  • Relaxed alignment mode (r) for both DKIM and SPF is appropriate and working correctly for organizational domain alignment
  • Zero quarantined or rejected emails indicates no legitimate email delivery issues despite the strict policy
  • All three sending IP addresses (69.169.224.1, 69.169.224.5, 69.169.224.6) are consistently passing authentication checks
  • No unauthorized sending sources detected in this reporting period
  • DMARC reporting is properly configured and being received from Enterprise Outlook
Concrete Action Items
Verify IP Address Documentation LOW

Description: Confirm that the three sending IP addresses are properly documented in your infrastructure inventory to maintain awareness of all authorized mail sources

Steps to Take:

  1. Verify that 69.169.224.1, 69.169.224.5, and 69.169.224.6 are documented in your mail infrastructure records
  2. Identify which mail service or server each IP belongs to (mail server, marketing platform, application server, etc.)
  3. Confirm these IPs are included in your SPF record
  4. Document the purpose/service associated with each IP for future reference

Affected IPs: 69.169.224.1, 69.169.224.5, 69.169.224.6

Expected Outcome: Complete visibility into all authorized sending sources with documented purposes for each IP address
Expand DMARC Reporting Coverage LOW

Description: Currently only receiving reports from Enterprise Outlook. Increase visibility by monitoring reports from other major email providers to ensure comprehensive authentication coverage

Steps to Take:

  1. Wait 7-14 days to collect DMARC reports from other providers (Gmail, Yahoo, AOL, etc.)
  2. Compare reports from multiple sources to identify any provider-specific issues
  3. Set up automated DMARC report aggregation using tools like DMARC Analyzer, Postmark, or dmarcian if handling reports manually becomes unwieldy
  4. Establish a regular review schedule (weekly or bi-weekly) for DMARC report analysis
Expected Outcome: Comprehensive view of email authentication across all major mailbox providers, not just Enterprise Outlook
Establish Baseline Metrics LOW

Description: Document current performance metrics to enable detection of future anomalies or changes in email sending patterns

Steps to Take:

  1. Record baseline: 3 sending IPs, 100% SPF pass rate, 100% DKIM pass rate, 0% failure rate
  2. Note the current email volume (4 emails in this reporting period from Enterprise Outlook)
  3. Set up alerts for: new sending IPs, authentication failures >1%, or sudden volume changes >50%
  4. Create a simple spreadsheet or monitoring dashboard to track these metrics over time
Expected Outcome: Historical baseline to quickly identify deviations from normal email sending patterns
Review DMARC Policy Effectiveness MEDIUM

Description: With a 'reject' policy in place and 100% pass rate, verify that the policy is being enforced by recipient servers and consider adding forensic reporting

Steps to Take:

  1. Check your current DMARC DNS record for the presence of 'ruf' (forensic report) tags
  2. If not present, consider adding ruf=mailto:dmarc-forensic@einsle.cloud to receive detailed failure reports
  3. Verify that the 'pct' (percentage) tag is set to 100 or omitted (defaults to 100) to ensure full policy enforcement
  4. Confirm the current DMARC record syntax: dig TXT _dmarc.einsle.cloud
  5. Test that forensic report email addresses are monitored and functional
Expected Outcome: Enhanced visibility into any future authentication failures with detailed forensic reports, and confirmation that the reject policy applies to 100% of non-compliant emails
Immediate Next Steps
  1. Continue current DMARC configuration - no immediate changes required
  2. Review DMARC reports weekly to maintain awareness of authentication status
  3. Document the three authorized sending IPs and their purposes within the next week
  4. Monitor for reports from additional mailbox providers over the next 2 weeks to expand visibility
  5. Consider implementing forensic reporting (ruf) within the next month for enhanced failure diagnostics
  6. Establish a quarterly review process to reassess DMARC policy and alignment settings
General Recommendations:
  • Continue monitoring DMARC reports regularly to detect any future authentication issues or unauthorized sending attempts
  • Consider implementing aggregate report collection from multiple mailbox providers (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, etc.) to get comprehensive visibility into email authentication
  • Document the three authorized IP addresses (69.169.224.1, 69.169.224.5, 69.169.224.6) and their purposes to maintain an inventory of legitimate sending sources
  • Review DMARC reports at least weekly to ensure continued compliance and early detection of any configuration drift
  • Consider adding forensic reporting (ruf tags) to your DMARC record if not already present to receive detailed failure reports when authentication issues occur
Authentication Records (3)
Source IP Hostname / Provider Count SPF DKIM Disposition
69.169.224.1 No reverse DNS 2 pass pass none
69.169.224.5 No reverse DNS 1 pass pass none
69.169.224.6 No reverse DNS 1 pass pass none
Back to Reports