Report Details

Report Metadata
Report ID:
9ab5d97806fc4d46bc060a77a2f25e57
Domain:
einsle.com
Reporter:
Enterprise Outlook (dmarcreport@microsoft.com)
Status:
processed
Created:
2026-04-02 12:53:40
Processed:
2026-04-02 12:54:19
Claude AI Analysis
LOW
Summary: Excellent DMARC performance for einsle.com with 100% authentication success across all 5 emails from 5 distinct sources. All messages passed both SPF and DKIM checks with a strict 'reject' policy in place. No authentication failures, unauthorized sources, or security concerns detected in this reporting period.
What's Working Well
  • Perfect authentication record: 100% of emails (5/5) passed both SPF and DKIM validation
  • Strict security posture: DMARC policy set to 'reject' demonstrates mature email security implementation
  • Relaxed alignment mode (r) appropriately configured for both DKIM and SPF, allowing for legitimate email forwarding and infrastructure complexity
  • Multiple sending sources (Microsoft 365 and Amazon SES) all properly configured with correct SPF and DKIM records
  • IPv6 readiness: Microsoft 365 infrastructure showing IPv6 connectivity (2a01:111:f403:c20b::1 and 2a01:111:f403:c20c::4)
  • Zero messages quarantined or rejected, indicating no spoofing attempts or configuration issues during this period
  • Enterprise Outlook reporting shows good relationship with Microsoft email infrastructure
Concrete Action Items
Document Authorized Email Infrastructure LOW

Description: Create or update documentation of all legitimate sending sources to maintain visibility of your email infrastructure and facilitate future troubleshooting.

Steps to Take:

  1. Document IP 2a01:111:f403:c20b::1 and 2a01:111:f403:c20c::4 as Microsoft 365/Outlook infrastructure (IPv6)
  2. Document IPs 54.240.7.12 and 54.240.7.17 as Amazon SES sending servers
  3. Document IP 69.169.224.1 as authorized sender (verify ownership/service)
  4. Create a spreadsheet or configuration management entry with IP addresses, PTR records, services, and purpose
  5. Schedule quarterly reviews of this documentation to ensure accuracy

Affected IPs: 2a01:111:f403:c20b::1, 54.240.7.12, 69.169.224.1, 2a01:111:f403:c20c::4, 54.240.7.17

Expected Outcome: Complete inventory of authorized sending infrastructure that can be referenced during security incidents or configuration changes
Verify IP 69.169.224.1 Service Identity LOW

Description: While this IP passed authentication, verify which service or application is sending from this address to maintain complete visibility of your email infrastructure.

Steps to Take:

  1. Perform reverse DNS lookup on 69.169.224.1 to identify the service
  2. Check email logs or headers from this IP to determine the email type/purpose
  3. Verify this service is documented in your IT asset inventory
  4. Confirm SPF and DKIM configuration for this source is intentional

Affected IPs: 69.169.224.1

Expected Outcome: Full identification of all email sending services with confirmed authorization
Implement DMARC Report Monitoring Automation MEDIUM

Description: Set up automated monitoring to detect changes in authentication patterns, volume anomalies, or new sending sources that could indicate configuration issues or security threats.

Steps to Take:

  1. Deploy a DMARC analysis tool or service (e.g., Postmark, dmarcian, Valimail, or open-source alternatives)
  2. Configure alerting for: authentication failures >5%, new unauthorized IPs, volume changes >50%
  3. Set up weekly digest reports summarizing DMARC statistics
  4. Create a dashboard for stakeholders to view email authentication health
  5. Establish a review schedule (weekly for first month, then monthly)
Expected Outcome: Proactive detection of email authentication issues before they impact deliverability or security, with reduced manual effort reviewing XML reports
Evaluate BIMI Implementation Readiness LOW

Description: With a mature DMARC 'reject' policy and perfect authentication, evaluate implementing BIMI to display your brand logo in supported email clients.

Steps to Take:

  1. Verify DMARC policy has been at 'quarantine' or 'reject' for at least 90 days
  2. Obtain a Verified Mark Certificate (VMC) from a BIMI-approved certificate authority
  3. Create an SVG version of your company logo meeting BIMI specifications
  4. Host the SVG logo on your domain's web server
  5. Create and publish a BIMI DNS TXT record at default._bimi.einsle.com
  6. Test BIMI implementation using available validation tools
Expected Outcome: Enhanced brand recognition and trust with your logo displayed in Gmail, Yahoo, and other supporting email clients
Review DMARC Reporting Configuration LOW

Description: Ensure DMARC reporting addresses are current and reports are being received from all major email providers.

Steps to Take:

  1. Verify the RUA (aggregate reports) email address in your DMARC record is monitored
  2. Check if RUF (forensic reports) are configured and whether you want detailed failure reports
  3. Confirm reports are being received from major providers (Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, etc.)
  4. Ensure the mailbox receiving reports has sufficient storage and retention policies
  5. Document the reporting configuration for team knowledge sharing
Expected Outcome: Reliable receipt of DMARC reports from all major email providers for comprehensive monitoring
Immediate Next Steps
  1. Continue monitoring DMARC reports on a regular schedule (weekly or bi-weekly recommended)
  2. Perform reverse DNS lookup on 69.169.224.1 to confirm service identity within the next week
  3. Evaluate and select a DMARC monitoring/analysis tool within the next 30 days to automate future reporting
  4. Document current sending infrastructure for institutional knowledge and compliance purposes
  5. Maintain current DMARC configuration unless business requirements change
  6. Consider BIMI implementation as a low-priority enhancement project for brand visibility
General Recommendations:
  • Maintain current DMARC policy configuration with 'p=reject' as it demonstrates mature email authentication
  • Continue monitoring DMARC reports regularly to detect any future authentication issues or spoofing attempts
  • Consider implementing BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification) to enhance brand visibility in supported email clients
  • Document the legitimate sending sources identified in this report (Microsoft 365, AWS SES) for future reference
  • Establish a baseline for normal email volume to detect anomalies in future reports
Authentication Records (5)
Source IP Hostname / Provider Count SPF DKIM Disposition
2a01:111:f403:c20b::1 mail-germanynorthazlp170100001.outbound.protection.outlook.com 1 pass pass none
54.240.7.12 a7-12.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com 1 pass pass none
69.169.224.1 b224-1.smtp-out.eu-central-1.amazonses.com 1 pass pass none
2a01:111:f403:c20c::4 mail-germanywestcentralazlp170120004.outbound.protection.outlook.com 1 pass pass none
54.240.7.17 a7-17.smtp-out.eu-west-1.amazonses.com 1 pass pass none
Back to Reports